Archive for the 'Travel insurance' Category

News - Travel agents’ deals ‘misleading’

Wednesday, January 9th, 2008


Cut-price travel companies have been accused of “misleading” customers with cheap internet prices by the Trading Standards Institute (TSI).


The TSI has criticised firms for holidays at prices that do not include must-have extras, such as taxes or fuel .


The TSI has urged the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) to halt the practice.


Travel industry group ABTA said its code included rules not to mislead but some low-cost operators ignored them.


‘Unrealistic prices’


We have a code of practice, which means charges must be included in the price
Sean Tipton, ABTA


A random check of online travel firms found several examples of vast differences between the advertised and actual price.


For example, one firm advertised a seven-night holiday in Benidorm from 59 per person but after compulsory extra charges were included, such as fuel supplements, the cost of the holiday rose to 266 for two adults.


“This misleading and illegal cocktail of confusion is being allowed to flourish and consumers are clearly being enticed to check out particular holidays and flights with unrealistic prices,” Bruce Treloar, TSI lead officer on travel said.


“Travel firms are adding the word ‘from’ - as in ‘Lanzarote, from 75′ - and then think it is acceptable to fail to offer any holidays which even come close to that magical figure, once must-pay supplements are added in,” he added.


The Association of British Travel Agents (ABTA) told BBC News that it supported the TSI’s call for a clampdown on misleading adverts.


“This has been an issue for a number of years, with no-frills companies advertising very low rates, attracting customers to their websites and then charging them more.


“We have a code of practice, which means charges must be included in the price. Not everyone has signed-up to this code and we need to see some action,” Sean Tipton, ABTA spokesman, said.





Your comments


The price should be the price you pay
Elaine Green, UK

At last something is being done about this. I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve checked multiple holidays online only to find the final price does not bear any reflection on the offer price. Check any online travel agency, the big ones included. This has been going on for years, started with the teletext holidays, and I am so frustrated with it. The price should be the price you pay, if you want extras fine, but compulsory “extras” such as fuel supplements must be included in the price. Holiday companies should be fined until they do, this practice will not change.
Elaine Green, UK


I work in the online travel industry - there is a horrible problem with supplements - operators should add them on, and have no reason to (why add 40 per person supplement, when you can simply increase the cost of the basic holiday) - but also remember that occupancy levels always effect the final price - it’s cheaper to fill a 2 bedroom apartment up with 4 that to share it between 2 people - when they advertise prices they don’t know how many people are going to be in the hotel rooms.
Robert Clegg, Altrincham, Cheshire


Another example of ‘undisclosed’ costs arose only in the past couple of weeks, when we found that on a coach escorted holiday in the USA, costs of between $3-$5 should be paid to the driver and a similar amount to the tour guide/director by EACH passenger for EACH tour day. In our case that would have been 12 days at a cost, which was not even mentioned in any booking documents or catalogue, of up to $240 (133). This was only realised a week before the holiday when the ticket and holiday details arrived. Coach journeys used to be a gratuity and anyone going on this time of holiday for the first time will probably not realise about the extra costs. It should be stated in the booking details. On a 49 seater coach this would raise 3258.50 - wish I could earn this type of money for 12 days work !
Michael Satherley, Bristol, UK




Not all agents who advertise on the web are out to mislead you
Jatinder Singh, London, UK


I work for a business travel agency in London, and offer flights on the web, the advert would say for example London to Delhi 299.00 plus taxes. The reason we don’t show the tax is simply because, they are based on the rate of exchange and also fuel prices so the tax today could be 50.00 but tomorrow could be 70.00. Not all agents who advertise on the web are out to mislead you.
Jatinder Singh, London, UK


Recently booked a holiday for 2 advertised for 324pp. After additional charges the total cost was 802. The additional charges were 40pp fuel supp and 1.5% Credit card charge. This negated any original discounts.
Mr Cardoza, Leicester


I recently complained to the Advertising Standards about online advertising of a product, and received the reply that they could not do anything about internet advertisements, despite the fact that the ad was on a .co.uk site, aimed at UK consumers. Small print, and hidden T & C’s are allowing advertising standards to drop, and consumers to be to become vulnerable!
Charlie Stott, UK



Taxes and fuel charges should be included in the price
Moonli Christian, Cardiff, UK


It is not only travel agents that advertise misleading prices but airlines as well. For example stating a flight to Paris is only 39, the final price ends up being closer to 70! Taxes and fuel charges should automatically be included in the price because what is the point of advertising a price when there is no way that consumers will be able to purchase the product at that price?
Moonli Christian, Cardiff, UK


My partner and I saved for a holiday over Christmas. We looked online and saw a 14 night, all inclusive trip to Mexico for 1100 each. We figured - we’ve saved hard and want to treat ourselves so why not. The actual figure we paid after all the “extras” were added on and the “no rooms in that hotel but we’ve got you another” was 1500 each which is a hell of a lot to add on to a price advertised for a holiday.
Ben, Sandhurst, UK


We are an internet travel agency and an ABTA member. We’d much prefer to show the price inclusive of all the extras, but ABTA turns a blind eye when their tour operating members distribute ‘basic’ prices and add all the extras on afterwards.
Antony Bradley, Croydon, England


The practice of “hidden” supplements is so frustrating and time consuming. Holidays often include additional supplements for meals, resort transfers, ticket on-collection, late booking fees, fuel supplements, under-occupancy (even when you get to the resort and there isn’t a spare bed to speak of), travel insurance (which you have to opt out of instead of opt-in if you already have it), credit card payment surcharge etc.


The other frustration is when you get to the price stage and then have to call up a phone number (rather than book online) and then find out that holiday is no longer available and the option is one more expensive.
Darren Sharp, London



Read more on site

News - Travel industry ignores disabled

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

Read source of it on the page
Disabled holidaymakers face so many problems travelling abroad that many do not bother taking a holiday, disability charity Leonard Cheshire warns.


The charity says that disabled people encounter difficulties from the moment they try to make a booking.


It is calling on tour operators, the government and the EU to improve access in a number of ways.


The industry admits that there is room for but says some progress has been made.


Taken for granted


Leonard Cheshire is publishing its report - called Wish You Were Here - to coincide with the return from the August bank holiday weekend.


Last year more than 1.5 million people flew out of UK airports during the last bank holiday of the summer.


The charity points out that while many people take foreign breaks for granted, disabled travellers are faced with a series of obstacles which can put them off foreign travel altogether.


It more than 100 disabled people to ask about their holiday experiences.


The report found that:

  • A quarter of those surveyed who had not taken a holiday in the past year said it was because of problems with accessibility
  • Almost half of those who did take a holiday thought their travel agent or tour operator lacked basic disability awareness
  • Almost 60% of those who has taken a holiday had problems with transport
  • Nearly a quarter had had a wheelchair or other mobility aid damaged in transit
  • Almost one in three people found their accommodation inaccessible
  • Nearly a quarter had difficulty obtaining travel insurance


“The package holiday has been around for over 50 years, so why should disabled people still find travelling abroad difficult?” said John Knight, Leonard Cheshire’s head of external policy.


“Disabled people have a right to holiday outside the UK and the travel industry must improve accessibility to ensure they can.”

Photo of a group of people on the beach including wheelchair users

Barcelona has good accessibility, beaches included


The charity is calling for the introduction of pan-European standards of accessibility that all member states will recognise.


And it says the government must bring air and sea travel within the scope of existing disability legislation.


It wants travel industry staff to receive compulsory disability awareness training, and wants the providers of travel insurance to deal with disabled people on a basis.


Long-standing disability legislation in the US means that disabled travellers have tended to report more positive experiences, a state of affairs with which Europe has yet to catch up.


Industry efforts


The Association of British Travel Agents (ABTA) says it has been encouraging the tourism industry to make for many years.


ABTA’s head of consumer affairs, Keith Richards, admitted that there was “still much room for improvement”.


“It is clear that increasing numbers of people who have some for of disability are taking holidays, and many more want to spend their money on travel but currently don’t,” he said.


Fear and ignorance surrounding disability issues was being compounded by air transport and overseas accommodation not being covered by UK disability legislation, Mr Richards said.


But he cited several steps ABTA was taking to improve the situation, such as providing training, using the voluntary Air Access Code, encouraging tour operators to carry out access audits on hotels and developing a checklist for disabled travellers.

News - Air travel delays: Your rights

Sunday, January 6th, 2008
Air travellers are preparing for another long day of delays, cancellations and uncertainty about their flights.

We’ve been finding out on Breakfast how some of our viewers have been affected, what - if any you can expect for delays or a cancelled flight and some of the long term implications.

Many of you have contacted Breakfast to say that you are reassured by additional security.

On Friday morning, the Bank of England listed the names of 19 men whose assets had been frozen - they are part of 24 arrested in connection with the plot to attack aircraft.

  • On Friday’s programme, we looked at some of the issues raised by the new security measures for travellers
  • information and advice for air travellers

  • We heard from the Independent Travel Editor Simon Calder.

    Travel writer Simon Calder

    Simon Calder: “This is a whole new world that we will have to get used to”

    He went through some tips on what you can and can’t take into an aircraft cabin, demonstrating with several items he’d brought into the studio.

    He said that anything bought beyond the security checks at an airport should be ok - for example items bought at a duty free shop.

    Simon also said that airlines should now allow you to add the weight of your hand luggage onto the existing hold-baggage limit, so travellers would not effectively be required to carry less.

    Watch our interview with Simon Calder


  • And Declan looked at the issue of compensation for those who suffered delays or had flights cancelled
  • Declan explaining travel insurance

    “Your travel insurance may not cover you”

    During Friday’s programme, Declan spoke to of ABTA and the Association of Travel Insurance Intermediaries.

    They explained whether airline customers would be entitled to a refund, another flight or any compensation

    Watch Declan’s report and interviews


    And consumer champion and presenter of the BBC’s Holiday Hit Squad programme, Alice Beer came into the studio

    Alice Beer

    Alice Beer: “Don’t take anything you don’t want to lose”

    She said expect that your whole life was going into the hold, and advised people not to bother with laptops, phones or cameras.

    If you did take any of these, she recommended backing up the data first, and if travelling on business, you could hire a laptop.

    Alice also noted that some of the UK websites were very slow in being updated with new information.

    Alice Beer in the Breakfast studio


  • Breakfast’s Sarah Campbell spoke to one woman and her son, due to fly to Canada.

    She found out how Sharmaine Phagu and her son were coping with now having to re-pack all their bags under the new rules.

    Sharmaine’s son said he would miss not having his games console on the long flight across the Atlantic.

  • Watch Sarah Campbell’s report and interview with Sharmaine from the link to the right of this page

  • Originaly from:

    News - Holiday queries

    Saturday, January 5th, 2008
    Simon Calder, travel editor at the Independent, answers your questions on holidays.


    Do you know of a web site for holiday insurance companies for people with health problems who are not usually covered by standard travel insurance?

    Insurance depends on the traveller’s condition, where they are going, and for how long. Companies with a large proportion of older travellers such as Wallace Arnold refer customers to medical screening companies such as Travellers Protection Services (08707 744 151, www..com). they will ask a series of questions and then decide whether or not cover is possible. Best advice is to declare everything, even if it happened 30 years ago.

    We have just returned from a two week holiday in Portugal, without taking out insurance. I’m not yet uninsurable as far as age is concerned, (only 60 at the moment), but when I was enquiring about policies two months ago, I noticed in every policy, in the bits where it tells you when your not insured, there was a paragraph about alcohol consumption. It basically states that the persons are not insured when connected with the consumption of alcohol. I called some companies to ask what it meant by that, as was I insured even with a modest glass or two of wine, and what level did they consider the person would not be covered. The customer advisor had to consult with her manager, and she then said that the management would convene a meeting and she’d call me back. About one hour later, she said the decision was taken that if a person was over the legal drink/drive limit for that particular country, even if they were not driving, they would be considered to be not insured. As this limit is zero in some countries, this could be quite a problem. Is this a common condition?

    The viewer is quite right, this is a common stipulation on the reasonable grounds that people should take responsibility for themselves. Spending the evening swigging ouzo or tequila and then for example going swimming or wandering across a main road doesn’t qualify. In practice, insurers are fairly generous with their interpretations, there are very few cases where they refuse to pay out on the grounds of drunkenness, and one last year that attracted a lot of publicity resulted in the insurers backing down and paying up.

    I have a Royal Bank of Scotland Gold account, with which I receive so called free travel insurance - is this worth the 10 I pay per month? I go away three to four times per year.

    For anyone who travels that often, annual insurance is definitely a good idea - but at 120 a year, if it’s only covering the viewer and not his family, then it looks overpriced to me. So if it is the only reason he chooses this account, I’d say shop around. It is worth stressing that some cards offer travel accident insurance which is much more limited in its scope.
    Plus, it’s best not to renew your travel insurance every year when it expires - if you don’t have a trip on the horizon, then you’re wasting your cash.

    Where do we stand after October this year with having to get a visa for a holiday to the United States as the agreement for the visa weaver scheme runs out. We cannot get hold of a biometric passport until April 2006.

    There is a wealth of misinformation about the latest tightening of US visa rules. For the vast majority of travellers it will have no effect at all. The rule only affects travellers who have their passports issued on or after 26 October 2005. If this is not a biometric passport - and there’s no way a British passport will be until next year at the earliest - then you will need a visa. This requires queuing up at London or Belfast, and is generally not a good thing. So how do you avoid that? If your passport is due to expire in the next couple of years, and you intend to travel to the US sometime after 26 October, renew it now.

    How do hotels allocate rooms? I always seem to be given one of the worst unless I know to ask for a certain location. Quite often if I arrive late I get a good room. Makes me think the worst are allocated first. Why?

    Always ask to see the room before you accept it. They are likely to show you one of the better rooms.

    How can we get hold of some Croatian currency before we travel there? We have searched around and nowhere seems to offer it.

    You can get Croatian currency - the Kuna - from High Street travel agents such as Lunn Poly, Thomas Cook, Going Places and First Choice. If your local branch doesn’t have any currency on the premises it should be able to order it for you and get it within a couple of days. However, why bother? There are exchange offices everywhere in Croatia and cash machines are widely available, so you should have no problem exchanging money when you get there. Also, you are likely to get a slightly better exchange rate in Croatia than in Britain.

    We have holidayed recently, and found a building site next door - cresting noise/sleeping problems. We complained at the time - the rep just laughed and said work had been going on for three to four years. We were offered another room, but refused as it was a room where smokers had been. We have been offered a token payment by the company, but consider their attitude disgraceful. Surely we must be advised, , of these works by law?

    In cases like this the viewer did the right thing, which was to tell the rep and give them a chance to sort out the problem. As he was still unhappy, I hope he got lots of evidence of the work that was going on. That will help his case if he decides to go to the Small Claims Court or arbitration. If the hotel was “allocated on arrival” accommodation, he will not have so strong a case as if it was in a brochure and the work in progress was not mentioned.

    Please explain (in words of one syllable) the new E111, and the process for obtaining it now and also next year.

    This certificate, an application for which can be downloaded from the Department of Health’s website (www.dh.gov.uk) or from the Post Office, entitles you to reduced price or free medical treatment in EU countries. It is not an effective substitute for travel insurance. The main change this year is that the E111 is now issued on an individual rather than family basis. Valid until December 2005. After that, travellers will need a European Health Insurance Card, which will replace the E111, but anyone who applies for an E111 this year should automatically receive a card.


    The opinions expressed are Simon’s, not the programme’s. The answers are not intended to be definitive and should be used for guidance only. Always seek professional advice for your own particular situation.


    Read source of it on the site

    News - Cost of insurance set to increase

    Friday, January 4th, 2008


    The cost of insurance is set to rise as new rules governing the industry come into force on Friday.

    Only firms authorised by the Financial Services Authority can now trade, and they are subject to strict guidelines on how policies are promoted and sold.

    Insurers’ extra costs are expected to be passed on to consumers, and a 2.80 average policy price rise is estimated.

    The British Insurance Brokers’ Association said the new rules would “protect consumers”.

    ‘Firms not ready’

    Firms will be legally required to issue documents that clearly and simply explain policy details, provider and price.



    It is virtually impossible to see what element of the premiums charged is due to the increased cost of regulation


    Nick White
    Head of personal finance, Uswitch.com

    The regulation is aimed at stopping people buying too much or too little cover.

    Some 9,700 firms had last month been approved to continue trading by the Financial Services Authority (FSA).

    But a survey by information solutions company Docucorp found that 92% of senior insurance managers were concerned firms would not be ready for Friday’s new regulations.

    The same percentage thought the FSA had the cost of the new rules.

    Nick White, head of personal finance at Uswitch.com, said: “The increased cost of such regulation does mean that insurance providers and brokers will look for ways to pass on the cost instead of eroding the profits they make.

    “Whilst the introduction of the ‘initial disclosure document’ and of price’ means that some of these costs will be visible, it is of course virtually impossible to see what element of the premiums charged is due to the increased cost of regulation.”

    More complicated?



    This will raise the professionalism of the whole industry and consumers will be able to better compare products and price


    How insurance regulation will affect you

    Firms awaiting a final decision by the FSA are granted interim authorisation, and consumer groups warned that people using these firms would not be entitled to if they lost money because the company folded.

    Travel insurance bought with a holiday through a travel agent also does not have the protection of the FSA.

    Which? magazine expressed concern that complex policies like income protection, critical illness and life insurance were now treated the same as simpler products like house and car insurance.

    Louise Hanson, Which? head of campaigns, said: “This is a major concern, as it’s much harder for people to choose the right product in these areas and there’s a greater risk if they’re sold the wrong policy.”


    Source:

    News - Thousands face travel cover woe

    Thursday, January 3rd, 2008


    Originaly from: page
    Thousands of people could lose their travel cover after the Financial Services Authority (FSA) took action against Whiteley Insurance Consultants.


    The West Yorkshire-based firm was placed into provisional by the High Court at the FSA’s behest.


    The FSA told the court that Whiteley - a brokerage - was selling travel insurance which was not underwritten by an insurer, invalidating the policies.


    The liquidators have set up a hotline, 08705 234803, for policyholders.


    ‘Worthless cover’


    Whiteley also traded as Kingfisher Travel Insurance and Kingfisher Insurance Services.


    The very early indication from the liquidators is that thousands of people could potentially have invalid insurance
    Caroline Feltham, PricewaterhouseCoopers


    The major concern, with one of the busiest travel weekends of the year approaching, is that many people who had bought travel insurance from Whiteley could now be left with worthless cover.


    The High Court appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) to act as provisional liquidators. It will deal with the affairs of the company ahead of a possible winding-up order.


    PwC Caroline Feltham told BBC News that it was too early to say how many of Whiteley’s policies are not underwritten by an insurer.


    “The very early indication from the liquidators is that thousands of people could potentially have invalid insurance,” Ms Feltham said.


    Ms Felthan advised Whiteley’s policyholders to call the special hotline and, if necessary, arrange new travel insurance cover.


    Whiteleys employs 40 staff, all of whom are being kept on by the provisional liquidator on full pay.

    News - Q&A: Insurers tackle terror fears

    Wednesday, January 2nd, 2008

    bomb alert in the UK left thousands of travellers stranded at airports across the country and overseas after flights were either cancelled or delayed.


    As services slowly return to normal, many people are counting the cost and wondering whether or not they can claim money back from their travel insurers.


    Does my insurance cover terrorism?


    Unfortunately, not in the majority of cases.


    Terrorism is what the industry calls an exclusion, meaning that most policyholders cannot claim for delays, lost hotel bookings, or incurred costs such as food and drinks.


    Some policies do offer cover for disruption caused by the threat of terrorism or acts of terrorism, but they are generally more expensive and harder to find than the standard cover offered by most firms.


    So I am going to be out of pocket?


    Don’t panic, you won’t have to write off your hard-earned cash.


    Airlines such as British Airways, Easyjet and Ryanair have been doing their best to get people on their way and are offering to rebook and even refund tickets for flights that were cancelled or delayed.


    If you organised a holiday through a travel agent or tour operator, you should also be OK.


    The main thing to do is get in touch with the companies involved and find out what they are willing to do.


    Also, keep your receipts and proof of spending - they probably will be asked for by the insurers in the event that the firms do offer to pay out.

    But what if I booked the holiday myself?


    This is where things get a bit trickier.


    While you should still be able to fly to your , you would not be able to claim for any add-ons such as lost hotel bookings or car hire.


    A lot will depend on the terms and conditions of your insurance policy and how willing the provider is to try to help out.


    Stephen Thorley is managing director of Travellers Protection Services, the company that provides insurance products for companies including budget airline Ryanair, cruise firm P&O and the Telegraph newspaper group.


    Mr Thorley recommends calling your insurer directly and discussing your circumstances.


    “We are all human,” he said. “And we have a sympathetic claims department.”


    Mr Thorley said that his company had already taken steps to help clients, changing the policy on valuables so that they would be covered when a traveller’s entire baggage had to be checked in to a plane’s hold.


    Travel insurance, what a rip-off!


    It may seem that way, but the industry argues that it is doing its best to meet the needs of customers with policies that offer enough cover without breaking the bank.


    Offering protection from terrorism “is one area we freely admit that even governments run scared from”, Mr Thorley said.


    Consumer groups aren’t sitting quietly, however, and have pressured the government to look into the possible mis-selling of insurance by travel agents and tour operators.

    The problem is that while many of the biggest insurance companies, such as Travellers Protection Services, are regulated by the Financial Services Authority, many of the smaller firms can operate without any supervision.

    One area of concern is that many customers don’t get given enough about the policies they are being sold by tour operators and travel agents, causing them to believe they are covered when in fact they aren’t.

    So how can I make sure I am protected?


    The Association of British Insurers recommends that you work out the type of cover you want and what best suits your travel needs - for example, you may find that an annual policy works out cheaper than buying separate insurance before each trip.


    Then, when you get a price, shop around in what the ABI describes as a very competitive market.


    And finally, make sure you read the terms and conditions carefully. It’s not small print, it’s the difference between getting proper insurance cover and finding yourself footing the bill instead.


    Read source on

    News - Travel insurance fraud ‘common’

    Monday, December 31st, 2007

    Originaly from:

    Nearly eight million have tried to make a bogus claim on their travel insurance, a survey has found.

    The study, by Direct Line Travel , found 15% of respondents had made a fraudulent claim.

    The fraud is often in the form of extra items being added to a genuine claim, or the values of lost items are inflated, the survey found.

    Direct Line warned that dishonest claims could mean honest policyholders would end up paying more.

    ‘Designer’ shades

    Four out of five of those who admitted making a fraudulent claim refused to elaborate on what they had done.

    But 15% admitted inflating the value of their claim, while 5% said their claim was totally fabricated.



    Honest policyholders could end up paying higher premiums for dishonest claims


    Chris Price, Direct Line Travel Insurance

    The most popular item for over-claiming was sunglasses, with 27% they had lied about how valuable their shades were.

    Other popular areas for values were luggage, medical bills, mobile phones and cameras.

    But it would appear many attempts at making a fraudulent claim fail.

    The survey found that 62% of those who tried to put in a bogus claim failed to get a pay out after their insurer became suspicious.

    “From our research it is worrying to see that so many opportunists don’t think twice about making a spurious claim,” said Chris Price, business manager at Direct Line Travel Insurance.

    “Unfortunately, honest policyholders could end up paying higher premiums for dishonest claims.”

    News - UK probes travel insurance sales

    Sunday, December 30th, 2007
    The UK Treasury is to launch a probe into travel insurance - and said it would consider new legislation if it found there had been .


    Travel insurance will be worth more than 650m in 2006, the Treasury said.


    However, despite paying out large sums, too many people will find they are not properly covered, it warned.


    The worry is that people may be sold travel insurance without having the terms and conditions properly explained to them.


    Ed Balls, the new treasury minister for regulation of financial services, said the first step would be to talk to the industry to collect information.


    ‘Without a hitch’


    More than 20 million people buy travel insurance every year, and based on consumer research many policies for the same trip offering similar levels of protection can vary in price by more than 200, the Treasury said.


    Our investigation will ask whether it’s fair to put all the pressure on ordinary families to read the small print
    Ed Balls, Treasury Minister


    “Millions of British families have worked hard all year to pay for their summer holidays and are hoping they pass off without a hitch,” Mr Balls said.


    “But thousands of holidaymakers will suffer cancelled flights, lost valuables, and even medical problems,” he added.


    Should the probe uncover evidence of mis-selling then the Treasury said it would have a number of routes to consider.


    One option would be to require stronger self-regulation by the travel industry, while another may be to include it under the control of the Financial Services Authority (FSA).


    Although travel insurance providers are regulated by the Financial Services Authority, travel firms selling policies as bolt-ons to their holiday packages are not.


    The Treasury said the government was “prepared to introduce new regulation if there is evidence of problems in the selling of these products, which cannot be adequately dealt with by self-regulation”.


    Industry standards


    The consultation process will be launched in early autumn, the Treasury said, adding that it will talk to stakeholders, including travel agents, travel reps, insurers, trade bodies, consumer associations and consumers themselves.


    The government last looked at the issue of travel insurance in 2003 but decided against imposing regulation because of concern at the impact on the cost of package holidays.


    It also shied away from regulation because travel agents insisted their own industry code was providing sufficient consumer protection, the Treasury said.


    “Our investigation will ask whether it’s fair to put all the pressure on ordinary families to read the small print and ask the right questions to make sure they are properly covered,” Mr Balls said.


    “It will ask whether the travel industry should be doing more to ensure families are not left high and dry on their holidays and whether we need to strengthen regulation to protect them,” he said.


    Source article

    Sport - Managers play down Tynecastle tie

    Sunday, November 11th, 2007


    “We’re capable of doing it - we`ve done it in the past - but I would like to think we can give Hearts and something to think about over the coming weeks.”


    McLeish is taking heart from his side’s performances in other big games this season - the Old Firm derby win and the Champions League success over Porto.


    “There is extra pressure but I think you only have to look at how we have handled the bigger games,” he continued. “We have done well.


    “The irony is that the games we were expected to do better in we have under-achieved and that will be significant.


    “Hearts are a good side. They have a great solid base, which George inherited, and the he has built around that unit have been very impressive.


    “When you go on a run like they have you start when you will drop points and you start to have wee doubts.


    “It’s only human and we hope we can put the doubts in their head for the next part of the .”




    Read source on